Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pythia fragment #3781

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Pythia fragment #3781

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

MohitS704
Copy link
Contributor

Updating the PYTHIA filter used for gluon fusion off-shell Higgs using MCFM+JHUGen to use the MCMultiParticleMassFilter, which was introduced here: cms-sw/cmssw#45344.

Since MCFM+JHUGen gridpacks are separated by final state, this formulation of the PYTHIA filters separated by the 4-lepton final-state works for each given gridpack. You can see a presentation on this at an HZZ meeting here: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1433234/#38-mc-simulation-gluon-fusion.

There is no filter planned for tau decays - so electrons and muons will be the only ones with a filter applied. For tau decays, simply use the fragment without a filter (GluGluToZZTo4L_TuneCP5_13p6TeV-MCFM-jhugen7.5.2_nofilter.py).

@bbilin
Copy link
Collaborator

bbilin commented Oct 22, 2024

Hi,

Thanks, we went through the presentation to understand the details, but unfortunately failed to do so.

Why do you want to turn off MPI? If there is a specific physics need that requires such a manipulation, you are invited to present in a GEN meeting such that we can understand the needs.

Thanks a lot,

B&L

@gritsan
Copy link

gritsan commented Oct 23, 2024

We did make a presentation at the GEN meeting back in October 2023, and Steve Mrenna suggested this particular configuration to have MCFM+Pythia and Pythia+Pythia in good agreement. We are not doing anything different from what Steve recommended. We assumed that this has been settled since almost a year ago, and now we proceed with the actual simulation of Run3 configuration, after implementing an additional filter.

@smrenna
Copy link
Contributor

smrenna commented Oct 23, 2024

Everything has to be understood in context. At the time, we were trying to validate the transverse momentum of the hard process, which is somewhat decoupled from the MPI. Because MPIs slow down the code considerably, I suggested we turn it off for the sake of validation of the hard process, only.

@smrenna
Copy link
Contributor

smrenna commented Oct 23, 2024

This is from the email of Sep 7, 2023: "If you set the runtime command PartonLevel:FSR = off, then you will not have to deal with the complication of any FSR. You would also turn off MPI in the same fashion."

But this is not for real physics.

@MohitS704
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see - then this is a misunderstanding on our end that I will fix. Thank you for weighing in @smrenna!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants