-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Best pose estimation model #14
Comments
@choyingw We believe that the model state dict you published for pose estimation doesn't match the PyTorch model class. Can you please clarify what to do? |
Oops. I uploaded the wrong model. I've updated the readme and the link. Please check. |
@choyingw Thanks for your quick response. I still get different results from what you reported on aflw2000 ( Yaw: 5.537 Pitch: 8.978 Roll: 6.132 || MAE: 6.882). My implementation is similar to https://github.com/vitoralbiero/img2pose/blob/main/evaluation/jupyter_notebooks/aflw_2000_3d_evaluation.ipynb I tried to follow your evaluation code, but found several files that you didn't share. For example, can you please share how you created 'aflw2000_data' folder and share the folder itself using google drive, or alternatively create full evaluation code that use the original data to estimate pose - it will be great. |
aflw2000-3D is shared in the link (ReadME, Single Image Inference Demo - Step4, Download the data) python benchmark.py -w "pathToPoseModel", you'll get the reported number. |
@choyingw Even using the latest "best_pose.pth.tar" I am still getting constant poses for any input image, equal to |
@bigdelys Hi, I didn't find this issue on my end. As I print out pose using AFLW2000-3D, the head pose angles are different. |
Hi @choyingw,
I am trying to use your pose estimation model - the one reproduces the results in the paper (https://drive.google.com/file/d/13LagnHnPvBjWoQwkR3p7egYC6_MVtmG0/view?usp=sharing) - but get fixed pose predicted angles for images with different poses.
When I am using with the regular model you published (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BVHbiLTfX6iTeJcNbh-jgHjWDoemfrzG/view?usp=sharing) this phenomenon doesn't happen and I get more logical results (but not SOTA for pose estimation).
I was wondering if this happens to you as well and is there a problem in the model you published?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: