Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Break up the Chef namespace into 4 namespaces #283

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 6, 2019
Merged

Break up the Chef namespace into 4 namespaces #283

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 6, 2019

Conversation

tas50
Copy link
Contributor

@tas50 tas50 commented Sep 6, 2019

This makes it easier for folks to pick and chose which cops they want to fail builds on or auto correct. Instead of just "Chef" we now have the following:

ChefEffortless: Cops to help with the migration to the Effortless pattern. These are disabled by default
ChefStyle: Cops that help with the format of your cookbooks
ChefModernize: Cops that help you modernize your cookbooks to better use functionality introduced in new Chef Infra Client Releases
ChefDeprecations: Cops that detect (and in many cases correct) deprecations that will prevent cookbooks from running on modern versions of Chef Infra Client

This makes it easier to disable things

Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
UseInlineResourcesDefined is now considered a deprecation
IncludingXMLRubyRecipe is now considered a deprecation
IncludingYumDNFCompatRecipe is now considered a deprecation
RespondToInMetadata has been moved to Modernize since it's not actually a deprecation
IncludingOhaiDefaultRecipe is now considered correctness as you shouldn't be forking a cookbook to install things via cookbook files

Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
@tas50 tas50 requested review from a team as code owners September 6, 2019 19:24
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith@chef.io>
@tas50 tas50 merged commit d00277e into master Sep 6, 2019
@chef-ci chef-ci deleted the docs branch September 6, 2019 19:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants