Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Static R docsite #1294

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Static R docsite #1294

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

ebezzi
Copy link
Member

@ebezzi ebezzi commented Oct 2, 2024

Restores the R static docsite.

@ebezzi ebezzi requested a review from ivirshup October 2, 2024 16:16
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.36%. Comparing base (b09d336) to head (57bf0ce).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1294   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.36%   91.36%           
=======================================
  Files          82       82           
  Lines        6482     6482           
=======================================
  Hits         5922     5922           
  Misses        560      560           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.36% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ivirshup ivirshup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ebezzi, this looks like an older version of the R docs than what we have up currently.

Should we just grab the R docs from the current gh-pages branch instead?

image image

@ebezzi
Copy link
Member Author

ebezzi commented Oct 3, 2024

@ebezzi, this looks like an older version of the R docs than what we have up currently.

Should we just grab the R docs from the current gh-pages branch instead?

image image

I used an outdated branch. I pushed an update.

@ivirshup ivirshup self-requested a review October 3, 2024 20:33
@ivirshup ivirshup merged commit a1aff8a into main Oct 3, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
@ivirshup ivirshup deleted the ebezzi/static-r-docs-october branch October 3, 2024 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants