Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIP10: adding nut.link oracles labels #40

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2020

Conversation

mmahut
Copy link
Contributor

@mmahut mmahut commented Nov 10, 2020

Opening a request to reserve https://nut.link/ metadata oracles metadata labels into CIP10. This is just a toy for now, but might be really used in the future.

crptmppt
crptmppt previously approved these changes Nov 11, 2020
@mmahut
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmahut commented Nov 11, 2020

Rebased on the new structure.

@crptmppt
Copy link
Contributor

@mmahut - sorry for the extra step, mind switching back? was trying to figure out the cleaner option and wasn't expecting you to rebase so quick

@crptmppt crptmppt dismissed their stale review November 11, 2020 14:09

needs a rebase

@mmahut
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmahut commented Nov 11, 2020

@mmahut - sorry for the extra step, mind switching back? was trying to figure out the cleaner option and wasn't expecting you to rebase so quick

No worries, looks like everything is up to date now.

CIP-0008/CIP-0010.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SebastienGllmt and others added 2 commits November 11, 2020 19:02
@crptmppt crptmppt merged commit 66c4e96 into cardano-foundation:master Nov 11, 2020
crptmppt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
* CIP10 - Transaction Metadata label registry (#34)

* CIP10 draft

* add forum post

* Update reserved range

* Update README.md

* CIP10: adding nut.link oracles labels

Co-authored-by: Sebastien Guillemot <SebastienGllmt@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants