Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HACKING.rst: introduce .net -> Networking refactor section #384

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2020

Conversation

OddBloke
Copy link
Collaborator

As I was looking at the initial implementation for this refactor, I realised that we didn't actually have a concrete description of the proposed refactor (and process). To save people from having to Just Know (TM), this introduces a section to HACKING.md named Ongoing Refactors as well as its first entry, for this refactor.

I do not intend this to be merged before I have an initial implementation (hence "Draft"), but figured that I may as well push this up for review while I'm working on that.

@OddBloke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

For ease of review, the rendered version of HACKING.md can be seen here: https://people.canonical.com/~dwatkins/pr384/topics/hacking.html#ongoing-refactors

Copy link
Collaborator

@raharper raharper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Dan, this is really well put together.

Copy link
Collaborator

@igalic igalic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm no seeing any mention of EphemeralIPv4Network or EphemeralDHCPv4, but i suppose that's another big refractor that can happen in another iteration.
baby steps.

@OddBloke OddBloke marked this pull request as ready for review May 25, 2020 18:23
@OddBloke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Given that we've agreed on this as a basis going forward, I actually think it makes sense to land this in-tree so that we can more easily discuss required amendments to it as I do the initial implementation. I've marked it as ready for review, and should be able to land it (with Ryan's review) once CI passes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants