-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 305
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(blueprint): Added blueprint #3585
Conversation
4465671
to
e08963f
Compare
e08963f
to
f52ba86
Compare
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ function getConfig(isReactExternalized) { | |||
examples: path.join(__dirname, '../examples/src'), // for examples only | |||
'box-ui-elements-locale-data': path.resolve(`i18n/${language}`), | |||
'box-locale-data': path.resolve(`node_modules/@box/cldr-data/locale-data/${language}`), | |||
lodash : path.resolve('node_modules/lodash'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
had to put this in because it was looking for lodash/merge within blueprint when it wasnt there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not clear on why this is needed since lodash is already present in package.json. Do we have a type mismatch? Or a misconfigured dependency in Blueprint?
.bcu-footer-message { | ||
padding: 0 10px; | ||
text-align: center; | ||
} | ||
|
||
.bcu-footer-right .btn { | ||
margin-left: 8px; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
doesnt look good if i left this in with the new buttons
f52ba86
to
e6db64f
Compare
e6db64f
to
c71a037
Compare
package.json
Outdated
@@ -316,6 +318,8 @@ | |||
"yargs": "^15.1.0" | |||
}, | |||
"peerDependencies": { | |||
"@box/blueprint-web": "^7.2.4", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there any reason why we have different version in peerDependecies?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
c71a037
to
40d8fe4
Compare
40d8fe4
to
9c00f38
Compare
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ function getConfig(isReactExternalized) { | |||
examples: path.join(__dirname, '../examples/src'), // for examples only | |||
'box-ui-elements-locale-data': path.resolve(`i18n/${language}`), | |||
'box-locale-data': path.resolve(`node_modules/@box/cldr-data/locale-data/${language}`), | |||
lodash : path.resolve('node_modules/lodash'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not clear on why this is needed since lodash is already present in package.json. Do we have a type mismatch? Or a misconfigured dependency in Blueprint?
@@ -3021,6 +3291,22 @@ | |||
"@radix-ui/react-use-size" "1.0.1" | |||
"@radix-ui/rect" "1.0.1" | |||
|
|||
"@radix-ui/react-popper@1.2.0": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not ideal to have two versions of the same library. It looks like we're already importing several @radix-ui
libraries via Storybook. Should we look at upgrading to get the versions in sync?
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Added Blueprint