Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pub Sub Binders for Spring Cloud Stream Template #339

Open
dwij2812 opened this issue Aug 13, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Pub Sub Binders for Spring Cloud Stream Template #339

dwij2812 opened this issue Aug 13, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dwij2812
Copy link

Reason/Context

  • Google Cloud Pub/Sub is widely used in the industry.
  • AsyncAPI 2.6.0 introduced Google Pub/Sub Bindings but the generators still do not support it as a binder.

Description

  • Integrating Pub/Sub with Spring Cloud Templates is easy as Google already has the cloud stream integration.
  • Adding the pubsub binders will enable lots of teams and enterprises to adopt Asyncapi.
@dwij2812 dwij2812 added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 13, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@AayushSaini101
Copy link

AayushSaini101 commented Mar 15, 2024

Hello guys, @fmvilas @derberg If it's fine with you, I would be glad to work on this issue under the Bounty Program, Q2-2024 as this is a potential issue for the Program.

I am already familiar with the Java templates and spring framework link](https://github.com/orgs/asyncapi/discussions/963#discussioncomment-8628690) for ease of access.
Thank you :)

@dwij2812
Copy link
Author

dwij2812 commented Jul 7, 2024

Hi Team,

Wanted to check on this if we have any plans to support Pub/Sub out of the box for the most common generators, as it would be very helpful and teams need not build custom solutions and maintain them in silos?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants