Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENHANCEMENT] argilla server: Add support for filter on list datasets #5374

Merged

Conversation

frascuchon
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR adds filter support to list user datasets endpoint. The endpoint allows filterirng by status and name. This can be used by clients when filtering by datasets.

Type of change

  • Improvement (change adding some improvement to an existing functionality)

How Has This Been Tested

Checklist

  • I added relevant documentation
  • I followed the style guidelines of this project
  • I did a self-review of my code
  • I made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I confirm My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added relevant notes to the CHANGELOG.md file (See https://keepachangelog.com/)

@frascuchon frascuchon requested a review from jfcalvo August 2, 2024 12:48
@frascuchon frascuchon changed the title [ENHANCEMENT] argilla server: Aadd support for filter on list datasets [ENHANCEMENT] argilla server: Add support for filter on list datasets Aug 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.97%. Comparing base (bf08e83) to head (1764584).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #5374      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    91.00%   90.97%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          144      144              
  Lines         5915     5914       -1     
===========================================
- Hits          5383     5380       -3     
- Misses         532      534       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
argilla-server 90.97% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@frascuchon frascuchon added this to the v2.2.0 milestone Sep 3, 2024
@frascuchon frascuchon modified the milestones: v2.2.0, v2.3.0 Sep 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: José Francisco Calvo <jose@argilla.io>
@frascuchon frascuchon merged commit 102d1d1 into develop Sep 18, 2024
0 of 2 checks passed
@frascuchon frascuchon deleted the feat/argilla-server/add-support-for-filter-on-list-datasets branch September 18, 2024 07:25
frascuchon added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
# Description
<!-- Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any
dependencies that are required for this change. -->

After changes from #5374 a
test is failing due to mismatched text. This PR fixes it.

**Type of change**
<!-- Please delete options that are not relevant. Remember to title the
PR according to the type of change -->


**How Has This Been Tested**
<!-- Please add some reference about how your feature has been tested.
-->

**Checklist**
<!-- Please go over the list and make sure you've taken everything into
account -->

- I added relevant documentation
- I followed the style guidelines of this project
- I did a self-review of my code
- I made corresponding changes to the documentation
- I confirm My changes generate no new warnings
- I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature
works
- I have added relevant notes to the CHANGELOG.md file (See
https://keepachangelog.com/)

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants