Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prepare_for_training evaluate Sequence(feature=ClassLabel))vs ClassLabel #2408

Closed
davidberenstein1957 opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2411
Closed
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement Indicates new feature requests
Milestone

Comments

@davidberenstein1957
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
training with autotrain does not work directly

Describe the solution you'd like
N.A. Evaluate if this should can be changed everywhere

Describe alternatives you've considered
N.A.

Additional context
N.A.

@davidberenstein1957 davidberenstein1957 added the type: enhancement Indicates new feature requests label Feb 23, 2023
@davidberenstein1957 davidberenstein1957 added this to the v1.4.0 milestone Feb 23, 2023
@davidberenstein1957 davidberenstein1957 self-assigned this Feb 23, 2023
davidberenstein1957 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2023
davidberenstein1957 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 23, 2023
frascuchon added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2023
# Description

During `autotrain` integration, I came across some issues with the 
Closes #2406 
Closes #2407
Closes #2408 
Closes #2405

**Type of change**

(Please delete options that are not relevant. Remember to title the PR
according to the type of change)

- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [X] Refactor (change restructuring the codebase without changing
functionality)
- [X] Improvement (change adding some improvement to an existing
functionality)
- [X] Documentation update

**How Has This Been Tested**

N.A.

**Checklist**

- [X] I added relevant documentation
- [X] I did a self-review of my code
- [X] I made corresponding changes to the documentation

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: frascuchon <francis@argilla.io>
@tomaarsen
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in #2411

cceyda pushed a commit to cceyda/argilla that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2023
 (argilla-io#2411)

# Description

During `autotrain` integration, I came across some issues with the 
Closes argilla-io#2406 
Closes argilla-io#2407
Closes argilla-io#2408 
Closes argilla-io#2405

**Type of change**

(Please delete options that are not relevant. Remember to title the PR
according to the type of change)

- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [X] Refactor (change restructuring the codebase without changing
functionality)
- [X] Improvement (change adding some improvement to an existing
functionality)
- [X] Documentation update

**How Has This Been Tested**

N.A.

**Checklist**

- [X] I added relevant documentation
- [X] I did a self-review of my code
- [X] I made corresponding changes to the documentation

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: frascuchon <francis@argilla.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Indicates new feature requests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants