[SEDONA-286] Correctly handle poles and anti-meridian in optimized sphere/spheroid distance join #989
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Kontinuation Please rebase. |
…ake pole and anti-meridian into consideration
Kontinuation
force-pushed
the
sphere-distance-join
branch
from
8a46278
to
8368a4b
Compare
jiayuasu
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2023
Kontinuation
added a commit
to Kontinuation/sedona
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2024
…here/spheroid distance join (apache#989)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Did you read the Contributor Guide?
Is this PR related to a JIRA ticket?
[SEDONA-XXX] my subject.What changes were proposed in this PR?
We generate anti-meridian-and-pole-aware envelopes for geometries when performing sphere/spheroid distance join.
If the join predicate
ST_DistanceSpherehas a custom radius (ST_DistanceSphere(geom1, geom2, radius)), then the join won't be optimized.How was this patch tested?
SphereDistanceJoinSuiteto test sphere/spheroid distance join on geometries scattered on the globe.Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?