Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[enhancement](compaction) Control the parallelism for urgent compacton tasks (#37782) #38189

Merged

Conversation

TangSiyang2001
Copy link
Collaborator

@TangSiyang2001 TangSiyang2001 commented Jul 22, 2024

Proposed changes

pick #37782

For some urgent compaction tasks, their submittion should take parallelism into account.

Currently, we apply the control policy for data loading in specific. Other source of urgent tasks are considered as eager.

…on tasks (apache#37782)

For some urgent compaction tasks, their submittion should take
parallelism into account.

Currently, we apply the control policy for data loading in specific.
Other source of urgent tasks are considered as eager.
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR

Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website.
See Doris Document.

@TangSiyang2001
Copy link
Collaborator Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.45% (9236/25342)
Line Coverage: 27.98% (75486/269787)
Region Coverage: 26.80% (38805/144800)
Branch Coverage: 23.55% (19704/83686)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/da78866818ff5c007d556f189f87db95121ff405_da78866818ff5c007d556f189f87db95121ff405/report/index.html

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit 7319912 into apache:branch-2.1 Jul 22, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
@yiguolei yiguolei mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2024
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants