Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEOMETRY-150: implemented a way to check if 2 vectors are codirectional #216

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

GEOMETRY-150: implemented a way to check if 2 vectors are codirectional #216

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

orionlibs
Copy link

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #216 (d65fb01) into master (c3e08ed) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 70.58%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #216      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     98.76%   98.72%   -0.05%     
- Complexity     3748     3754       +6     
============================================
  Files           195      195              
  Lines         10462    10479      +17     
  Branches       1544     1549       +5     
============================================
+ Hits          10333    10345      +12     
- Misses           12       14       +2     
- Partials        117      120       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...he/commons/geometry/euclidean/threed/Vector3D.java 98.58% <62.50%> (-1.42%) ⬇️
...ache/commons/geometry/euclidean/twod/Vector2D.java 98.90% <66.66%> (-1.10%) ⬇️
...ache/commons/geometry/euclidean/oned/Vector1D.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@orionlibs orionlibs closed this Jul 14, 2023
@orionlibs orionlibs deleted the GEO-150-1D-isCodirectionalTo-isAntidirectionalTo branch July 14, 2023 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants