Here's a screenshot of the example in the notebook for quick reference:

Codecov Report

Merging #261 (d5bbee1) into master (c6ce893) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #261   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.36%   71.36%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        4173     4173           
  Branches      637      637           
=======================================
  Hits         2978     2978           
  Misses       1007     1007           
  Partials      188      188           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c6ce893...d5bbee1. Read the comment docs.

another reference to add would be

Kohlbrenner et al.: Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRP

which properly introduces the composite LRP pretty much at the same time as Montavon et al (preprints existed a bit earlier) and evaluates the composite approach against other methods and approaches.

is there anything else I can help with?

is there anything else I can help with?

Is there anything you would change about the example in the screenshot?

maybe add some line(s) actually using this custom built analyzer, and some example heatmaps of this composite rule with non-composite counter parts for comparison?

a hint at the existing LRP presets (if they will be carried over to version 2.0) would also be interesting to the users I guess.

A usage example is already in the notebook.
I will add a comparison with the existing presets.

Thanks!