We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/54446 In https://github.com/WordPress/wordpress-develop/blob/trunk/src/wp-includes/blocks/calendar.php on line 103 (in the function block_core_calendar_update_has_published_posts) the option is named gutenberg_calendar_block_has_published_posts. Should it be called something else? The option is retrieved in the function block_core_calendar_has_published_posts some lines above, and may be updated as well.
Should be backported to WordPress 5.9.
Swapped gutenberg_* with wp_* in the option name.
See patch in the linked branch.
No response
WordPress trunk
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kebbet
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Description
https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/54446
In https://github.com/WordPress/wordpress-develop/blob/trunk/src/wp-includes/blocks/calendar.php on line 103 (in the function block_core_calendar_update_has_published_posts) the option is named gutenberg_calendar_block_has_published_posts. Should it be called something else? The option is retrieved in the function block_core_calendar_has_published_posts some lines above, and may be updated as well.
Should be backported to WordPress 5.9.
Swapped gutenberg_* with wp_* in the option name.
Step-by-step reproduction instructions
See patch in the linked branch.
Screenshots, screen recording, code snippet
No response
Environment info
WordPress trunk
No response
Please confirm that you have searched existing issues in the repo.
Yes
Please confirm that you have tested with all plugins deactivated except Gutenberg.
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: