Unable to reproduce the experimental results in the paper according to the default configuration file of the code.

[mingheyuemankong]

I'm very sorry to bother you again! I think your work is excellent, but I want to seek the help of the author to solve my confusion.
According to the configuration file in the code, I can't reproduce the results in the paper. The indexes such as AP on the three datasets are lower than the experimental data in the paper. For example, the AP error on D2SA and KINS datasets reaches 4%-6%, and the error on COCOA cls is even larger.
What I want to ask are:
(1) The weights in the three datasets configuration files under the configs folder are all
WEIGHTS: "detectron2://ImageNetPretrained/MSRA/R-50.pkl"
Can training with this weight achieve the data results in the paper? If so, why is there a big gap between my reproduced results and the paper?
(2) If the author uses other weights to achieve such excellent data in the paper, can the author provide the weight link used?
I look forward to the author's valuable reply. @trqminh

[trqminh]

Sorry for the late response, I see what is your concerning. I will update you as soon as I can.

[mingheyuemankong]

Yay, thanks and looking forward to your brilliant answers!

[mingheyuemankong]

Excuse me, is it still convenient to solve this problem about reproducing thesis data recently?

[trqminh]

I am working on it, hope you can wait a bit more

[mingheyuemankong]

Okay, thank you for your patient reply。

[lcl-git-3d]

Hi,have you solved this problem?

[mingheyuemankong]

No, I didn't solve the problem.