-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 833
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ExponentiatedGradientReduction does not work for drop_prot_attr=True, needs one-line fix #267
Comments
jdnklau
added a commit
to jdnklau/AIF360
that referenced
this issue
Sep 6, 2021
nrkarthikeyan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 7, 2021
Fix exponential gradient reduction without protected attribute (#267)
dplecko
pushed a commit
to dplecko/AIF360
that referenced
this issue
Nov 5, 2021
…ed-AI#267) Signed-off-by: Drago Plecko <www.plecko@gmail.com>
Illia-Kryvoviaz
pushed a commit
to Illia-Kryvoviaz/AIF360
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2023
Illia-Kryvoviaz
pushed a commit
to Illia-Kryvoviaz/AIF360
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2023
Fix exponential gradient reduction without protected attribute (Trusted-AI#267)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In the implementation for ExponentiatedGradientReduction the dropping of the protected attribute fails during prediction.
This is due to this line, which does not try to drop the protected attribute from the columns correctly.
It should rather be (cf. this line above from similar method)
In the current implementation, initialising ExponentiatedGradientReduction with
drop_prot_attr=True
allows fitting the inprocessing model, but throws an exception at prediction time like this:Kind regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: