You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the diseases and function tables are pretty useless, with just string descriptions of the diseases and functions. They are mostly unique entries. It would be better to either condense them into categories (so they are useful for gene clustering) or run some other sort of clustering on them.
I currently see three ways we could do this:
Like the thesaurus, manually go over them and add the data (but its long and tedious);
Using the word vectors provided by the iUPHAR, run clustering (but the name / description does not really matter for the actual meaning of the phrase, especially for diseases).
Scrap the whole idea and use cherry-picked GO terms instead (which? how to be unbiased? GO download is also very slow)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the diseases and function tables are pretty useless, with just string descriptions of the diseases and functions. They are mostly unique entries. It would be better to either condense them into categories (so they are useful for gene clustering) or run some other sort of clustering on them.
I currently see three ways we could do this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: