-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Technical Handbook v3.1.0 inconsistencies - cbc:CustomizationID is missing from root element table in section 2.4 #interproc #375
Comments
Good afternoon, However, in the section 2.3 of the technical handbook, there is indeed an UML image with this attribute inside the class. This is a mistake and that image will be corrected in the documentation. Kind Regards, |
Good morning, Thank you for your answer. I see that the "cbc:CustomizationID" root element was present in the previous version (3.0.1) of the ESPD-EDM. I also tried to find a text regarding this removal in the release notes but couldn't find anything. We are using the value coming from this element in our code, and this change is having an impact on us. It would be nice if there was a reference for changes of this kind in the release notes. |
Dear Konstatinos, the removal of this CustomizationID attribute was part of the removal of all the CEN-BII references implemented in release 3.1.0, in this case this attribute was used to store the reference. The removal of the CEN-BII references was indeed included in the release notes for 3.1.0, but not with the full detail of the changes. Apologies for that. Kind Regards, |
Dear Konstantinos, for CustomizationID and ProfileID we cannot publish in the documentation the value, nor the source reference for copyright issues. Could you please clarify if what you need are: Option b is not feasible for us Kind Regards, |
Hello @delgajc , If I understand it correctly, option a) is to roll back the removal of those two elements, correct? But the wording of option b) confusing me a little bit. Assuming you are implementing option a), would the rolled-back elements have the same values as before? |
Hello ESPD team, Following the discussion we had during the OUC meeting on the 23rd of March, to ensure we are on the same page, it is agreed that the elements (cbc:CustomizationID, cbc:ProfileID) will be restored but with different values (no CEN-BII references). If I understand correctly, this change will not be a part of the v3.2.0 release. The question now is, what about the new values the two elements will contain? At least considering the cbc:CustomizationID, it is crucial to include two fixed values to achieve interoperability because, to me, it is a little bit unclear who will decide for those two values (one for the ESD Request and one for the ESPD Response). The same question applies to the cbc:ProfileID. |
Dear Konstantinos,
KR |
Hello ESPD team,
It seems that the cbc:CustomizationID element has been omitted in the technical handbook version 3.1.0 in the relevant root elements table, but I can still see it in the above UML diagram.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: