-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SC-References: performance of works / deliveries / services of the specified type #362
Comments
Hello, do you have any answer? It seems about 2 weeks we haven't got any reply. |
Good, afternoon, |
Hello @JelenaCaik, Thank you for your questions. They have been analysed thouroughly and here is the first outcome. For Question 1, the Question Subgroup (QSG) for "References" (at line 21) has cardinality "1..n" and all its children have cardidinality "0..1", except the evidence QSG. Then yes, it would be more natural to have the related QSG with the cardinality "0..n", if we apply the generalisation law. However, the cardinality of the QSG is not inconsistent per say, since it is most likely that at least one child value is going to be provided by the seller (Economic Operator EO) or that the seller might provide an evidence saying that he does not have any reference. For Question 2 :
Kind regards, |
Hi, |
Hey @pascalinelaur, |
Good morning, |
Good morning, |
Dear @Nikanoras, In ESPD v3.3.0 we provided a fix in the way the elements are mapped from ESPD Request to ESPD Response. Kind regards, |
Hello,
I would like to clarify the logic of criterion appearance and cardinality for Selection Criteria >
==============
QUESTION 1:
Based on XSD file Cardinality for Criteria question group is 1 ..n, for Reference is 1..n, (group in group), so fields from row 21 to row 40 could be repeated N times. When we check all fields inside, we see all fields from row22 to row 33 are optional. And only EVidence (information online) is mandatory.
So it could be a case, when user leave all fields empty for criteria and only need to fill in Evidence information.
Is that really correct?
Or should we have at least any other mandatory field for Reference or Recipient?
==============
QUESTION 2:
Example:
If buyer enters "Minimum number of reference" = 2:
a) should we repeat Reference sub group minimum 2 times for seller (without possibility to remove them, rows 21-40 | c8ec5c30-2c17-4936-abbb-392523d873e5)?
b) OR should we repeat group row 19-41 | a44e24e9-f878-4651-9ead-e0b1387dae09 ?
Can EO adds a Reference group (c8ec5c30-2c17-4936-abbb-392523d873e5) additionally more than minimum number of references?
Row 19, ElementUUID=a44e24e9-f878-4651-9ead-e0b1387dae09 has cardinality 1..n, when (in what case) we need to repeat this sub-group?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: