Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency between eCertis and ESPD #interproc #356

Open
Nikanoras opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Inconsistency between eCertis and ESPD #interproc #356

Nikanoras opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
3rd party Pending for 3rd party information or decision eCERTIS

Comments

@Nikanoras
Copy link

Hi,
I'm trying to get information about 3 criteria from eCertis.
This info is from taxonomy:

  • envir-law a80ddb62-d25b-4e4e-ae22-3968460dc0a9
  • socsec-law a261a395-ed17-4939-9c75-b9ff1109ca6e
  • labour-law a34b70d6-c43d-4726-9a88-8e2b438424bf

Here're the links API calls I'm using to fetch them:
https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/ecertisrest/criteria/a80ddb62-d25b-4e4e-ae22-3968460dc0a9
https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/ecertisrest/criteria/a261a395-ed17-4939-9c75-b9ff1109ca6e
https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/ecertisrest/criteria/a34b70d6-c43d-4726-9a88-8e2b438424bf

Here's what I get for each of them:
image

When I try to get a list of all criteria from eCertis by the API call https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/ecertisrest/criteria I get different IDs:

  • envir-law e04ba507-8ca1-41ab-9091-eaddcd7a591d
  • socsec-law f0de31d8-bfda-413f-a6f0-ae8ea455db86
  • labour-law fd603360-f48a-4c0c-9f8c-e7e8ac77e648

And it works. I can get criteria information by the later mentioned IDs from eCertis.

  1. Which IDs are the correct ones?
  2. If the ID's in taxonomy are the correct ones, how to proceed this with kind of issue?
@acolomer acolomer added the 3rd party Pending for 3rd party information or decision label Nov 22, 2022
@acolomer
Copy link
Contributor

Good morning,
Thank you very much for your comment.
This is not an ESPD issue, but an eCertis issue instead. Therefore, we have send it to the eCertis team so they can work on it. They will work on it on 2023, we will provide you their answer as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
The ESPD Team

@Nikanoras Nikanoras changed the title Inconsistency between eCertis and ESPD Inconsistency between eCertis and ESPD #interproc Dec 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3rd party Pending for 3rd party information or decision eCERTIS
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants