Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

loading time of ultrasound multiframe instance[Bug] #4252

Open
olivert1969 opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

loading time of ultrasound multiframe instance[Bug] #4252

olivert1969 opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Awaiting Reproduction Can we reproduce the reported bug?

Comments

@olivert1969
Copy link

Describe the Bug

OHIF takes a long time to load an ultrasound multiframe instance

Steps to Reproduce

see https://discourse.orthanc-server.org/t/loading-time-of-the-ultrasound-sequence-file/4714 for steps to reproduce

The current behavior

Alain Mazy from Orthanc project mentioned: "each viewer loads data differently: StoneViewer frame by frame while OHIF loads the entire instance in one go".

The expected behavior

Would it be possible to make OHIF data loading a configuration option, e.g. frame by frame loading for multiframe instances? entire instance for single frame instances?

OS

Windows 11

Node version

16.x

Browser

Chrome 125.x

@olivert1969 olivert1969 added the Awaiting Reproduction Can we reproduce the reported bug? label Jun 21, 2024
@sedghi
Copy link
Member

sedghi commented Jun 28, 2024

We load frame by frame for each instance, if you look at this study

https://viewer-dev.ohif.org/viewer?StudyInstanceUIDs=1.2.276.0.7230010.3.1.2.2723277605.10168.1676054414.178

and open network panel

and double click on different series

CleanShot 2024-06-28 at 13 46 46@2x

you will see above which is requesting each instance separately for wadors.
Wadouri is another topic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Reproduction Can we reproduce the reported bug?
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants