Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update RFC process documentation to reflect **RFC 0130: Stalled RFCs** #142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023

Conversation

kevincox
Copy link
Contributor

@kevincox kevincox commented Mar 4, 2023

The main sections are largely copy+pasted from the RFC text itself. Minor modifications were made to integrate into the existing document.

  • Change to future tense to reflect what actions will be taken in each scenario.
  • Fix up some links to be relative to this document.
  • Update template message to be a codeblock for easy copy+pasting when used.

The main sections are largely copy+pasted from the RFC text itself. Minor modifications were made to integrate into the existing document.

- Change to future tense to reflect what actions will be taken in each scenario.
- Fix up some links to be relative to this document.
- Update template message to be a codeblock for easy copy+pasting when used.
@kevincox kevincox self-assigned this Mar 4, 2023
@lheckemann lheckemann merged commit 557d280 into NixOS:master Mar 8, 2023
@kevincox kevincox deleted the stale-rfcs-docs branch March 8, 2023 13:45
KAction pushed a commit to KAction/rfcs that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2024
NixOS#142)

The main sections are largely copy+pasted from the RFC text itself. Minor modifications were made to integrate into the existing document.

- Change to future tense to reflect what actions will be taken in each scenario.
- Fix up some links to be relative to this document.
- Update template message to be a codeblock for easy copy+pasting when used.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants