Add/update HWRF physics #188
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ | ||
| [submodule "atmos_cubed_sphere"] | ||
| path = atmos_cubed_sphere | ||
| url = https://github.com/climbfuji/GFDL_atmos_cubed_sphere | ||
| branch = dtc/hwrf-physics | ||
| [submodule "ccpp/framework"] | ||
| path = ccpp/framework | ||
| url = https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework | ||
| branch = master | ||
| [submodule "ccpp/physics"] | ||
| path = ccpp/physics | ||
| url = https://github.com/climbfuji/ccpp-physics | ||
| branch = dtc/hwrf-physics |
Submodule atmos_cubed_sphere
updated
2 files
| +6 −6 | model/fv_dynamics.F90 | |
| +4 −2 | tools/external_ic.F90 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Submodule physics
updated
46 files
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | ||
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | ||
|
|
||
| <suite name="HAFS_v0_hwrf" version="1"> | ||
| <!-- <init></init> --> | ||
| <group name="time_vary"> | ||
| <subcycle loop="1"> | ||
|
|
@@ -14,12 +14,12 @@ | |
| <subcycle loop="1"> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_rad_reset</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_rrtmg_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_lw_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_lw</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_lw_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_sw_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_sw</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_sw_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_rrtmg_post</scheme> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
| </group> | ||
|
|
@@ -37,12 +37,14 @@ | |
| </subcycle> | ||
| <!-- Surface iteration loop --> | ||
| <subcycle loop="2"> | ||
| <scheme>gfdl_sfc_layer</scheme> | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. what is the difference between the sfc_dff and the gfdl_sfc_layer? There was a problem hiding this comment. I defer this question to @grantfirl who added the GFDL surface layer scheme. As far as I understand, it is entirely different from the GFS surface layer scheme. There was a problem hiding this comment. Yes, it is the surface layer scheme from WRF called the "GFDL surface layer scheme" used in HWRF. It is not closely related to sfc_diff. It's been a long time since I worked on this and don't remember many of the details, but you're welcome to look at the PR when this was originally merged into the HWRF CCPP physics: (NCAR/ccpp-physics#452) |
||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_loop_control_part1</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_nst_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_nst</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_nst_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_noah_wrfv4_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_noah_wrfv4</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_noah_wrfv4_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_sice</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_loop_control_part2</scheme> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
|
|
@@ -61,13 +63,15 @@ | |
| <scheme>GFS_GWD_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rayleigh_damp</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_stateout_update</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>ozphys_2015</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>h2ophys</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_DCNV_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>get_phi_fv3</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_3</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>samfdeepcnv</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_DCNV_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_SCNV_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>samfshalcnv</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_SCNV_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_4</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>cnvc90</scheme> | ||
|
|
||
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ | ||
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | ||
|
|
||
| <suite name="HAFS_v0_hwrf_thompson" version="1"> | ||
| <!-- <init></init> --> | ||
| <group name="time_vary"> | ||
| <subcycle loop="1"> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_time_vary_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_rrtmg_setup</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_rad_time_vary</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_phys_time_vary</scheme> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
| </group> | ||
| <group name="radiation"> | ||
| <subcycle loop="1"> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_rad_reset</scheme> | ||
| <!-- <scheme>sgscloud_radpre</scheme> --> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_rrtmg_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_lw_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_lw</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_lw_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_sw_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_sw</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rrtmg_sw_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_rrtmg_post</scheme> | ||
| <!-- <scheme>sgscloud_radpost</scheme> --> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
| </group> | ||
| <group name="physics"> | ||
| <subcycle loop="1"> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_phys_reset</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_stateout_reset</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>get_prs_fv3</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_1</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_composites_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>dcyc2t3</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_composites_inter</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_2</scheme> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
| <!-- Surface iteration loop --> | ||
| <subcycle loop="2"> | ||
| <scheme>gfdl_sfc_layer</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_loop_control_part1</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_nst_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_nst</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_nst_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_noah_wrfv4_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_noah_wrfv4</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_noah_wrfv4_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_sice</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_loop_control_part2</scheme> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
| <!-- End of surface iteration loop --> | ||
| <subcycle loop="1"> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_composites_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_diag</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>sfc_diag_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_surface_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_PBL_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>hedmf</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_PBL_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_GWD_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>cires_ugwp</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>cires_ugwp_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_GWD_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>rayleigh_damp</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_stateout_update</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>ozphys_2015</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>h2ophys</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_DCNV_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>get_phi_fv3</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_3</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>samfdeepcnv</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_DCNV_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_SCNV_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>samfshalcnv</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_SCNV_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_suite_interstitial_4</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>cnvc90</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_MP_generic_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>mp_thompson_pre</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>mp_thompson</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>mp_thompson_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_MP_generic_post</scheme> | ||
| <scheme>maximum_hourly_diagnostics</scheme> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
| </group> | ||
| <group name="stochastics"> | ||
| <subcycle loop="1"> | ||
| <scheme>GFS_stochastics</scheme> | ||
| </subcycle> | ||
| </group> | ||
| <!-- <finalize></finalize> --> | ||
| </suite> |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am curious, why do we change the order of sw/lw radiation computation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because HWRF runs lw first and sw afterwards. @mzhangw or @ligiabernardet can explain this better, hopefully.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@climbfuji is correct. It is the practice in HWRF/WRF.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For what it's worth, I swapped the order and ran the HWRF regression tests against the newly created baseline with the original (HWRF) order:
The results were b4b identical.