Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

convered worldprovider to joml #3837

Closed

Conversation

pollend
Copy link
Member

@pollend pollend commented Feb 26, 2020

This is a continuation of #3811 and this PR mainly focused on world provider and ported over methods that use those methods. Some other classes had to be moved over because they use maps of block locations and blocks. I added a rounding method to JOMLUtility and we might want to look into adding a PR to JOML adding some kind of rounding constructor between Vector3f <--> Vector3i

@httpdigest
Copy link

httpdigest commented Feb 26, 2020

we might want to look into adding a PR to JOML adding some kind of rounding constructor between Vector3f <--> Vector3i

Please have a look at the github release notes of the latest JOML releases. In particular this commit: JOML-CI/JOML@ba58982

@lgtm-com
Copy link

lgtm-com bot commented Feb 26, 2020

This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging 0c38618 into a9263f7 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

  • 1 for Type mismatch on container modification
  • 1 for Type mismatch on container access

@GooeyHub
Copy link
Member

Hooray Jenkins reported success with all tests good!

@pollend
Copy link
Member Author

pollend commented Feb 26, 2020

we might want to look into adding a PR to JOML adding some kind of rounding constructor between Vector3f <--> Vector3i

Please have a look at the github release notes of the latest JOML releases. In particular this commit: JOML-CI/JOML@ba58982

I'll drop you a PR when I get the chance. probably later this week. :P

@pollend pollend closed this Apr 27, 2020
@pollend pollend deleted the feature/joml_block_conversion branch February 13, 2021 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants