Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: render network and gpu widgets individually instead of as pair #886

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 6, 2024

Conversation

caesay
Copy link
Contributor

@caesay caesay commented Jul 29, 2023

This allows a &filter= query parameter to be included when requesting multi-graph views (such as network and gpu).

For example, if you were to construct the following url: ?graph=network&filter=down then only the download chart will be displayed in a single-column layout.

This method seemed cleaner to me than splitting out new options for the graph parameter (eg. graph=network-up).

@MauriceNino MauriceNino merged commit df59729 into MauriceNino:dev Jan 6, 2024
1 check failed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
# [5.3.0](v5.2.3...v5.3.0) (2024-01-06)

### Bug Fixes

* add back and fix arm/v8 ([4284cf2](4284cf2))
* bundling third party modules with cli package ([156ec72](156ec72))
* lint not working for view ([5849edd](5849edd))
* remove arm/v7 for now ([0ba25cd](0ba25cd))
* remove arm/v8 for now ([6408997](6408997))
* testing errors ([f2937fd](f2937fd))

### Features

* [gpu] allow to filter-out some controller ([9651122](9651122))
* **cpu widget:** allow user to switch (default) processor core view ([4def64e](4def64e))
* render network and gpu widgets individually instead of as pair ([#886](#886)) ([df59729](df59729))

### Performance Improvements

* fix windows cpu 100% usage ([9c23e93](9c23e93))
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2024

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 5.3.0

Please check the changelog for more details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants