Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about reproducing the results in Table 1 #11

Open
MickShen7558 opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Question about reproducing the results in Table 1 #11

MickShen7558 opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@MickShen7558
Copy link

Hi,

First of all, thank you for your great paper and codes, and also the trained model you provided.

I trained the model on ModelNet40 using the default settings in your code twice. Then I found the performance on the evaluation set of my best model is much worse than the results in Table 1 in the paper.

> ********************mean********************
> rot_MSE: 39.06458769078561, rot_RMSE: 6.250167013031381, rot_MAE: 1.0076209857277225, trans_MSE: 0.004946976434439421, trans_RMSE: 0.07033474743366241, trans_MAE: 0.009108548983931541
> ********************median********************
> rot_MSE: 8.32185003866275e-12, rot_RMSE: 2.884761695298721e-06, rot_MAE: 2.884761695298721e-06, trans_MSE: 3.552713678800501e-15, trans_RMSE: 5.960464477539063e-08, trans_MAE: 5.960464477539063e-08

The test was performed on the second half categories with 1000 points sampled. I also test your provided trained model with the same setting and got the same performance as in the paper:

********************mean********************
rot_MSE: 25.622303942241103, rot_RMSE: 5.061847878220078, rot_MAE: 0.9258663473932836, trans_MSE: 0.0031295332591980696, trans_RMSE: 0.05594222992658615, trans_MAE: 0.008093184791505337
********************median********************
rot_MSE: 4.499777552562683e-12, rot_RMSE: 2.121267911547875e-06, rot_MAE: 2.121267911547875e-06, trans_MSE: 1.9984014443252818e-15, trans_RMSE: 4.470348358154297e-08, trans_MAE: 4.470348358154297e-08

I guess this proves that adding point sampling during testing doesn't harm the performance?

Therefore, I would like to know more details about how you train and test over ModelNet40:

  1. Is the best model selected by total test loss or test transformation loss?
  2. In the paper you mentioned that

We also partitioned 20% of the training set for evaluation.
Does it mean that you used 20% training + the whole test set for validation during training and testing? Or did you only use the 20% training set for training and testing?

  1. Are there any additional settings for testing on ModelNet40? I see the code is for 3DMatch in default.

Thanks again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant