Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add VICReg in SSL models #1028

Open
felipevillaarenas opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Add VICReg in SSL models #1028

felipevillaarenas opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@felipevillaarenas
Copy link

馃殌 Feature

Pytorch lightning implementation of the VICReg model following the style of other SSL models already available in PL Bolts.

Motivation

VICReg is a SOTA model that is frequently used in Self Supervised Learning benchmarks but is not available in PL Bolts.

This method avoids the collapse problem with two regularizations terms applied to both embeddings separately: (1) a term that maintains the variance of each embedding dimension above a threshold, (2) a term that decorrelates each pair of variables. Unlike most other approaches to the same problem, VICReg does not require techniques such as: weight sharing between the branches, batch normalization, feature-wise normalization, output quantization, stop gradient, memory banks, etc., and achieves results on par with the state of the art on several downstream tasks.

Pitch

I already ported my code of VICReg from PyTorch to PyTorch Lightning. Also, I wrote the module trying to keep the style used in PL bolts for other SOTA Self-Supervised models (e.g. simsiam, simclr).

Then I would like to add this module to the PyTorch Lightning Bolts repo. You can find the code on my repo.

Additionally, similar to other SSL models in PL Bolts the module supports the following datasets: cifar10, stl10 and imagenet.

Additional context

I have pre-train the model for CIFAR10(here WandB eval metrics for CIFAR10) but pertaining of stl10 and imagenet are still pending

@felipevillaarenas felipevillaarenas added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jun 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant