You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi.
I'm trying to reproduce the results shown in the docs with regards to reconstruction quality using the CIFAR-10 pre-trained VAE (LHS are the real images, RHS are the generated)
Here is a link to a self-contained colab notebook that reproduces the steps I follow to perform the inference and reconstruct the pictures. It is a simple script that loads the model, the weights, and tests it over the training set. My problem is that I get a much worse reconstruction (top row are real images, bottom row are the generated ones):
Am I doing something wrong? Could it be that those weights are not as good as one would expect from the image in the docs?
Thanks
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi.
I'm trying to reproduce the results shown in the docs with regards to reconstruction quality using the CIFAR-10 pre-trained VAE (LHS are the real images, RHS are the generated)
Here is a link to a self-contained colab notebook that reproduces the steps I follow to perform the inference and reconstruct the pictures. It is a simple script that loads the model, the weights, and tests it over the training set. My problem is that I get a much worse reconstruction (top row are real images, bottom row are the generated ones):
Am I doing something wrong? Could it be that those weights are not as good as one would expect from the image in the docs?
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions