-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keywords/MESH terms versus subject-group(s) #56
Comments
See examples loaded to elements repo: https://github.com/JATS4R/elements/blob/master/keywords.md Please add your examples |
I've added a PeerJ example for subjects and keywords (and yes, quite different!). |
RE: "We don't use defined MeSH terms, should we? This is medical, what covers all life sciences?" If a controlled vocabulary like MeSH is being used as a pick-list of keyword or subject terms, then it could be useful for reuse for this to be indicated explicitly (but still leave the publisher the option of using their own list or no list)... ...so might be nice to have something more explicit for markingup where a list of terms had been used. Oh, and we cant 'insist' on using MeSH or anything in life science, of course, as this will not apply to other disciplines (humanities, social sciences) or even physical sciences... (I will add Ubiquity Press keyword example) |
Some thoughts on this:
Pinging @rdrysdale |
Hi The PLOS thesaurus (https://github.com/PLOS/plos-thesaurus)
it all depends what you are trying to do, with what |
Can people elaborate on what they think this refers to from our priority list?
This is what I think, using the eLife examples:
eLife uses article-categories for some specific "keywords" that are used in the navigation of article pages, with subj-group-type attributes. JATS provides no defined list of attributes, so we're all probably doing it differently!
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Cell biology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Computer science</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
We also have keywords composed of the author generated keywords as well as a research organism from a defined eLife list:
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"> <title>Author keywords</title> <kwd> <italic>Salpingoeca rosetta</italic> </kwd> <kwd>Algoriphagus</kwd> <kwd>bacterial sulfonolipid</kwd> <kwd>multicellular development</kwd> </kwd-group> <kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"> <title>Research organism</title> <kwd>Mouse</kwd> <kwd> <italic>C. elegans</italic> </kwd> <kwd>Other</kwd> </kwd-group>
We don't use defined MeSH terms, should we? This is medical, what covers all life sciences?
Please add your thoughts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: