Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix wording in transitioning-contractor-code-to-innersource-model.md #653

Merged

Conversation

spier
Copy link
Member

@spier spier commented Feb 13, 2024

@zkoppert @claredillon I think there was a double negation introduced here that changed the meaning in the wrong way. At least the description in the "Problem" section that I am changing in this PR did not fit to what the "Patlet" says.

Also while we are talking about this, question to @gyehuda and @zkoppert:
Did you make any new experiences in this space that you can share?

We got another question about this area in Slack, so the topic of "agency code & InnerSource" could be relevant to explore a bit deeper.

@spier spier added 1-initial Donuts, Early pattern ideas, ... (Please see our contribution handbook for details) 📖 Type - Content Work Working on contents is the main focus of this issue / PR labels Feb 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@zkoppert zkoppert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing! I don't have any new experience in this area to add.

@spier spier merged commit 2fb2a04 into main Feb 13, 2024
9 checks passed
@spier spier deleted the wording-fix-transitioning-contractor-code-to-innersource-model branch February 13, 2024 19:06
rmarting pushed a commit to rmarting/InnerSourcePatterns that referenced this pull request Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1-initial Donuts, Early pattern ideas, ... (Please see our contribution handbook for details) 📖 Type - Content Work Working on contents is the main focus of this issue / PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants