You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
2022.05.16 16:22:47:341 zio-default-async-1 INFO org.renci.relationgraph.Main.program:57
Running reasoner
2022.05.16 16:28:28:181 zio-default-async-1 INFO org.renci.relationgraph.Main.program:60
Done running reasoner
2022.05.16 16:28:28:257 zio-default-async-1 ERROR org.renci.relationgraph.Main.run:77
Ontology is incoherent; please correct unsatisfiable classes.
From #101 it seems maybe that --disable-owl-nothing is not sufficient in itself, although this ontology should not have individuals, and the error is about correcting unsatisfiable classes. Perhaps it is the case the RL part does things like check for disjointness violations as rules regardless of owl-nothing?
While we should fix upheno, it would be good to have a mode that is for just calculating the relation graph from nothing more than RBox axioms, subClassOf, someValuesFrom (perhaps classAssertion). While this can be done as a robot step it's convenient to do directly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yields
From #101 it seems maybe that
--disable-owl-nothing
is not sufficient in itself, although this ontology should not have individuals, and the error is about correcting unsatisfiable classes. Perhaps it is the case the RL part does things like check for disjointness violations as rules regardless of owl-nothing?While we should fix upheno, it would be good to have a mode that is for just calculating the relation graph from nothing more than RBox axioms, subClassOf, someValuesFrom (perhaps classAssertion). While this can be done as a robot step it's convenient to do directly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: