Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Encoding for Scripts and Predicates #5513

Closed
Tracked by #4769
IGI-111 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
Tracked by #4769

Encoding for Scripts and Predicates #5513

IGI-111 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
ABI Everything to do the ABI, especially the JSON representation compiler General compiler. Should eventually become more specific as the issue is triaged epic An epic is a high-level master issue for large pieces of work.

Comments

@IGI-111
Copy link
Contributor

IGI-111 commented Jan 24, 2024

No description provided.

@IGI-111 IGI-111 added compiler General compiler. Should eventually become more specific as the issue is triaged ABI Everything to do the ABI, especially the JSON representation labels Jan 24, 2024
@kamyar-tm kamyar-tm added the epic An epic is a high-level master issue for large pieces of work. label Feb 22, 2024
xunilrj added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2024
## Description

This PR implements the new encoding for contracts/scripts/predicates.
#5512 and
#5513

### Contract Calls

When the new encoding is turned on using `--experimental-new-encoding`,
contract calls like the example below will be "desugarized" differently
now.

```sway
let base_asset_id = BASE_ASSET_ID;
let other_contract_id = ContractId::from(0xa38576787f8900d66e6620548b6da8142b8bb4d129b2338609acd121ca126c10);

let test_contract = abi(ContextTesting, other_contract_id.into());
let returned_contract_id = test_contract.get_id { gas: gas, coins: 0, asset_id: BASE_ASSET_ID.value}(1, 2, 3);
```

and will be transformed to

```sway
let base_asset_id = BASE_ASSET_ID;
let other_contract_id = ContractId::from(0xa38576787f8900d66e6620548b6da8142b8bb4d129b2338609acd121ca126c10);

let test_contract = abi(ContextTesting, other_contract_id.into());
let returned_contract_id = contract_call::<ContractId, _>(other_contract_id.into(), "get_id", (1, 2, 3), coins, asset_id, gas);
```

And the important part is the `contract_call` function in the std
library. This function does all the encoding as necessary and delegates
the actual call to an intrinsic function `__contract_call`. Allowing the
protocol to evolve entirely in Sway.

```sway
pub fn contract_call<T, TArgs>(contract_id: b256, method_name: str, args: TArgs, coins: u64, asset_id: b256, gas: u64) -> T
where
    TArgs: AbiEncode
{
    let first_parameter = encode(method_name);
    let second_parameter = encode(args);
    let params = encode(
        (
            contract_id,
            asm(a: first_parameter.ptr()) { a: u64 },
            asm(a: second_parameter.ptr()) { a: u64 },
        )
    );
    __contract_call::<T>(params.ptr(), coins, asset_id, gas)
}
```

### Contracts

On the other side, when the flag `--expiremental-new-encoding` is turned
on, the contract specification like the one below is being transformed
into all the decoding and encoding necessary.

The mains points are:

- The compiler generates a function called `__entry` that decodes the
method name and its arguments. The method is selected with a bunch of
`if`s at the moment, because we don´t have `match` for string slices.
Then we `decode` the arguments using the correct type, which is a tuple
with all the function arguments, and expand this tuple calling the
function;
- All the contract functions are converted to global functions prefixed
with `__contract_method`;
- Results are encoded and returned using the intrinsic call `__retd`.

Example:

```sway
abi SomeContract {
    fn some_function(a: u64) -> u64;
}

impl SomeContract for Contract {
    fn some_function(a: u64) -> u64 {
        1
    }
}
```

will be transformed into 

```sway
fn __entry() {
    let method_name = decode_first_parameter();
    if method_name == "some_function" {
        let args = decode_second_parameter::<(u64,)>();
        let result = __contract_method_some_function(args.0);
        __retd(encode(result));
    }
    __revert(0);
}
```

### Scripts and Predicates

The protocol to call scripts and predicates will also change and will be
very similar to contracts. See more above. Now when the flag is turned
on, the `main` function will not be entry point anymore. The compiler
will actually generate an `__entry` function that will decode arguments
and encode the result, like contracts.

For example:

```sway
fn main(a: u64) -> u64 {
    1
}
```

will be transformed into

```sway
fn __entry() {
    let args = decode_script_data::<(u64,)();
    let result = main(args.0);
    __retd(encode(result));
}

fn main(a: u64) -> u64 {
    1
}
```

## Tests

To facilitate testing this PR introduces three changes to our test
harness:

1 - A new parameter can be called to update test output files (abi and
storage json). This facilitates when we only want to copy and paste
these output files to their respective oracles. Brings the framework
closer to a snapshot one.

``` 
> cargo r -p test --release -- --update-output-files
```

2 - Depending on the configuration at `test.toml` multiple executions of
the same test will be scheduled. At the moment, tests that depend on the
encoding will run with the `--experimental-new-encoding` flag
automatically. For example:

```
Testing should_pass/language/main_args/main_args_copy_copy ... ok
Testing should_pass/language/main_args/main_args_copy_copy (New Encoding) ... ok
```

3 - A new `script_data_new_encoding` was created because we want to
support and run tests with the two encoding for a time. This is also
what flags tests to run with the flag on automatically.

## Checklist

- [x] I have linked to any relevant issues.
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas.
- [x] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the
reference, and the Sway book).
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works.
- [x] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary
`Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant.
- [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs
Code Review
Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md).
- [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
@xunilrj xunilrj closed this as completed Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ABI Everything to do the ABI, especially the JSON representation compiler General compiler. Should eventually become more specific as the issue is triaged epic An epic is a high-level master issue for large pieces of work.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants