[HOLD for payment 2024-08-05] [$250] [HybridApp] 'Update App' page redirects users to NewDot standalone

[Julesssss]

cc @trjExpensify @AndrewGable

Problem

Hybrid users can't access the app when the version doesn't match the current min-version. Users with the redirection NVP set get stuck on each app open. The 'update' button takes them to the NewDot standalone app which isn't helpful.

Solution

Update the URL to OldDot app listing before Hybrid is shipped.

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01fd6e839e5481e762
• Upwork Job ID: 1817838538974475497
• Last Price Increase: 2024-07-29

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @twisterdotcom

[hungvu193]

@Julesssss Since I reviewed #46194, can you please assign me to this issue? TIA 😄

[staszekscp]

I think this can be closed 😄

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01fd6e839e5481e762

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @hungvu193 is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @twisterdotcom (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[Julesssss]

Assigning BZ for payment. @twisterdotcom this is complete, can you just pay out a PR review for @hungvu193 please

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.13-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [HybridApp] Fix links to app stores on HybridApp  #46194

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-08-05. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @hungvu193 requires payment through NewDot Manual Requests

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@hungvu193] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@hungvu193] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@hungvu193] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@hungvu193] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@hungvu193] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@twisterdotcom] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[twisterdotcom]

Payment Summary:

• @staszekscp does not require payment (Contractor)
• @hungvu193 paid $250 via Manual Requests (C+)

[hungvu193]

Requested on ND

[JmillsExpensify]

$250 approved for @hungvu193