[HOLD for payment 2024-02-26] [TS migration] Migrate 'EditSplitBill' page to TypeScript

[melvin-bot]

TypeScript migration

Make sure you read through our TypeScript's style guide, cheatsheet and PropTypes conversion table before you start working on this migration issue.

Files

Path	Dependencies
src/pages/EditSplitBillPage.js	18

[melvin-bot]

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

[SzymczakJ]

Hey! I’m Jakub Szymczak from Software Mansion, an expert agency, and I’d like to work on this issue!

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @srikarparsi, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @sakluger (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[mallenexpensify]

d'oh, sorry, quick-typed the wrong C+, updated.

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.42-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• [TS Migration] Migrate EditSplitBillPage to typescript #35053

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-02-26. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @jjcoffee requires payment (Needs manual offer from BZ)
• @SzymczakJ does not require payment (Contractor)

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@jjcoffee] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@jjcoffee] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@jjcoffee] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@jjcoffee] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@jjcoffee] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

Issue is ready for payment but no BZ is assigned. @twisterdotcom you are the lucky winner! Please verify the payment summary looks correct and complete the checklist. Thanks!

[melvin-bot]

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

• C+: @jjcoffee paid $250 via Upwork here
• Contributor: @SzymczakJ is from an agency-contributor and not due payment

BugZero Checklist (@twisterdotcom)

• I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
• I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
• I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
• I have verified the payment summary above is correct

[twisterdotcom]

Awaiting acceptance of offer from @jjcoffee

[jjcoffee]

@twisterdotcom Accepted, thank you!

[twisterdotcom]

Paid.