Fix albgrd_col value in SurfaceAlbedoType #1810
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
billsacks
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2022
ekluzek
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2022
|
Another one I'll bring in. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
Fix value of albgrd_col in SurfaceAlbefdoType.F90.
Previously, the wrong value (albgri_col) was being set in InitHistory.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #1788
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? no
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? no
Testing performed, if any:
Just for testing, I activated ALBGRD in hist_addfld2d to output the var and tested for SMS_Ld1_PS.f09_g17.I2000Clm50BgcCru.cheyenne_gnu.clm-datm_bias_correct_cruv7.
The tests passed on cheyenne.