Update stream_definition_datm.xml to include longer time period in files #277
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merged
slevis-lmwg
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
mvertens
changed the title
|
This is ready for review; @slevis-lmwg has already reviewed the changes, and I just updated the PR to ensure the branch is up to date. It looks like this may need a review from someone with write access in addition to the review from Sam. |
|
@TeaganKing (and @slevis-lmwg or others): Should we bring this in now, or is there some reason to wait to merge it? |
|
Thanks @billsacks . I'm not aware of any reason to wait to merge this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
This PR includes files containing longer time periods (1849-2101) in
datm/cime_config/stream_definition_datm.xmlfor the following SSP370 streams:co2tseries.SSP3-7.0andpresaero.SSP3-7.0Contributors other than yourself, if any: @wwieder , @ekluzek , @samsrabin
CDEPS Issues Fixed: #246
Are there dependencies on other component PRs (if so list): No
Are changes expected to change answers: No, the files are just extended but contain the same data for the later part of the time period
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes): No
Testing performed (e.g. aux_cdeps, CESM prealpha, etc):
Hashes used for testing: