Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

COMMON and EQUIVALENCE Analysis #26

Open
ben-brewer-codethink opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

COMMON and EQUIVALENCE Analysis #26

ben-brewer-codethink opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ben-brewer-codethink
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@ben-brewer-codethink
Copy link
Member

Currently we don't check that EQUIVALENCE statements are valid, and compatible with COMMON block rules.
To do this we'll need to generate a memory map, and error on any unresolvable conflicts.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ben-brewer-codethink ben-brewer-codethink

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ben-brewer-codethink