You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When cancelling a dust order and placing closer opposite order need to set own asset limiter to avail balance. allow_partial=True doesn't solves the problem when sides are massively imbalanced because allow_partial=True still has a soft limit.
Tets failing: test_allocate_asset_dust_order()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also when placing closer order when only one order needed to reach target spread, allow_partial=True also used. Probably need to remove soft limit imposed by allow_partial=True: balance > order['base']['amount'] * self.partial_fill_threshold), and probably remove bundling when bootstrap is off.
bitphage
changed the title
SO: dust order cancel bug
SO: refactor place_closer_order allow_partial
May 15, 2019
When cancelling a dust order and placing closer opposite order need to set own asset limiter to avail balance.
allow_partial=True
doesn't solves the problem when sides are massively imbalanced becauseallow_partial=True
still has a soft limit.Tets failing:
test_allocate_asset_dust_order()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: