Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

keep del when del-set produced #723

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

inspurSDN
Copy link

what I did:
when del-set-sequence exist in consumer table, I keep the del event been execute even a set of the same key is already seen after the del.
why I did:
in the old code, the del is setting an key without fv, so if a set with fv after, it will only execute a set, so the multimap m_toSync can not seen the del event, sometimes the lost del may result errors if something is depending on the del event.

what I did:  
    when del-set-sequence exist in consumer table, I keep the del event been execute even a set of the same key is already seen after the del.
why I did:
    in the old code, the del is setting an key without fv, so if a set with fv after, it will only execute a set, so the multimap m_toSync can not  seen the del event, sometimes the lost del may result errors if something is depending on the del event.
what I did:  
    when del-set-sequence exist in consumer table, I keep the del event been execute even a set of the same key is already seen after the del.
why I did:
    in the old code, the del is setting an key without fv, so if a set with fv after, it will only execute a set, so the multimap m_toSync can not  seen the del event, sometimes the lost del may result errors if something is depending on the del event.
keep del when del-set-sequence exist, update the ut
added  support for TEST(ConsumerStateTable, set_pop_del_set_pop_get)
added support for TEST(ConsumerStateTable, async_set_del_set)
add comments for insert a DEL
remove comments for test again
add comments for test again.
@inspurSDN
Copy link
Author

always failed for something different vstest cases, all not involved what I do, it is such a bad experience.

only for test again
@inspurSDN inspurSDN changed the title keep del when del-set-sequence exist keep del when del-set produced Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant