Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping between 300 clips in Task 2/3 and 21 videos in Task 1 #1

Open
adit98 opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Mapping between 300 clips in Task 2/3 and 21 videos in Task 1 #1

adit98 opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@adit98
Copy link

adit98 commented May 23, 2024

Hi,

I was wondering if the training/validation/testing splits of the 300 clips used in tasks 2 and 3 correspond to the train/val/test splits of the 21 videos used in task 1. In other words, are the 170 clips of the Task 2 training set all taken from the 10 training videos of task 1, and similarly for val and test? Thanks!

@ziyiwangx
Copy link
Owner

ziyiwangx commented May 24, 2024

Hi @adit98

Thanks for your question.

The data splits of train/val/test for Task 2/3 correspond to the videos in Task 1 as follows: 1-10/11-16/17-21. Details about the clip-video data mapping information can be found in the supplementary material.

@adit98
Copy link
Author

adit98 commented May 29, 2024

Ok, if I understood correctly:

Task 1 Train/Val/Test: 1-10 / 11-14 / 15-21
Tasks 2 and 3 Train/Val/Test: 1-10 (Clips 1-170) / 11-16 (clips 171-227) / 17-21 (clips 228-300)

Would it be possible to see the metadata on the mapping between the frames of each clip and the frames of the originating video?

@ziyiwangx
Copy link
Owner

Yes, the dataset splitting is the same as we used in the paper.

We did not record the precise timestamps for Task 2/3 corresponding to the Task 1 original videos.
In the annotation file, we provide the mapping between each clip and the surgical phases in Task 1, which can be used as a rough reference if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants