Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hafs_regional_storm_following_1nest_atm_ocn failed with debug test #1588

Closed
junwang-noaa opened this issue Jan 30, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#622 or #1606
Closed
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Hafs group reported that the hafs_regional_storm_following_1nest_atm_ocn test failed in debug mode. The error showed in the moving nest lat info in the module_wrt_grid_comp.F90.

To Reproduce:

From Biju:
I ran regression tests with "hafs_regional_storm_following_1nest_atm_ocn_wav" and "hafs_regional_storm_following_1nest_atm_ocn" with DEBUG flag on.

The first one (hafs_regional_storm_following_1nest_atm_ocn_wav) completed successfully, but the second one(hafs_regional_storm_following_1nest_atm_ocn) failed with the error:

forrtl: error (72): floating overflow
Image PC Routine Line Source
fv3.exe 000000000FDCDAAB Unknown Unknown Unknown
libpthread-2.31.s 000014EB7A0AF8C0 Unknown Unknown Unknown
fv3.exe 0000000005C1454B module_wrt_grid_c 759 module_wrt_grid_comp.F90

One difference I noticed between these two runs is that in the first one, the output_grid is (rotated_latlon,rotated_latlon), while in the second one, the output_grid is (regional_latlon, regional_latlon_moving).

Additional context

Output

@junwang-noaa junwang-noaa added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 30, 2023
@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The issue is in the initialization step where the moving nest domain does not have lat-lon information defined until the run step on the write grid component yet. So the assignment of output grid lat/lon should not be done until the run step.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment