"The AWS Access Key Id you provided does not exist in our records" on minio instances.

[codeOfRobin]

Bug Report

I'm getting a The AWS Access Key Id you provided does not exist in our records error when trying to upload/download to our minio instance. I've confirmed that they keys are indeed correct (they work for the web app)

Steps which explain the enhancement or reproduce the bug

1. Setup a new minio.io instance
2. Try uploading via rome once (that seems to work)
3. Try uploading/downloading, it'll fail with a "The AWS Access Key Id you provided does not exist in our records" error

Current behavior

Uploads and Downloads do not work with minio.io instance

Rome version:

0.21.0.58 - Romam uno die non fuisse conditam.

OS and version:

macOS Mojave 10.14.5 Beta (18F131a)

[codeOfRobin]

Also, I can confirm that this command does indeed work on v0.20.0.56 which means it's probably a regression in the latest version.

[tmspzz]

Can you check if you have a combination of env variable and config file ?

[codeOfRobin]

We just have the config/credential files at ~/.aws

[tmspzz]

Ok, I will take a look. Seems odd as I’m also using credential file and I can’t see how it would be different when using Minio or S3.

[itsthejb]

Hi everyone,

Just trying Rome for the first time, and hitting this issue. All AWS config appears to be correct, and I can use aws s3 commands with the same config. Reverting to version 0.20.0.56 works as expected. So regression, or docs need updating?

[tmspzz]

I can not reproduce the issue neither on CI nor on my local setup. If anyone has and idea how to, I would be more than glad to solve it. Please take a look as the basts tests setup for reference.

…

Sent from my iPhone

On 15 Jun 2019, at 15:06, Jonathan Crooke ***@***.***> wrote: Hi everyone, Just trying Rome for the first time, and hitting this issue. All AWS config appears to be correct, and I can use aws s3 commands with the same config. Reverting to version 0.20.0.56 works as expected. So regression, or docs need updating? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[tmspzz]

I think I have identified the problem on 0.23.0.60. Not sure about the other versions. As you can see from here I'm also using env variables

[tmspzz]

never use type aliases

-          >>= flip getEndpointFromFile (fromMaybe "default" profile)
+          >>= getEndpointFromFile (fromMaybe "default" profile)