-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for BRTFS RAID #883
Comments
Hi, here are some useful outputs from Size:
I don't have any labels on this FS. But if you want to grab them, this is how
To get info about the disks involved:
For detailed usage info (per disk as well):
Same command as above but without
There are also options to show this in a more compact table (might be more parsable) This is what
As you can see ,the percentage is correct (matches with previous info) but the capacity is only the sum of the disks, it doesn't take into account the loss of data due to parity overhead like the commands above do. If you want to poke around more and have a btrfs mount yourself, |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A user (@zwimer) of my project requested BRTFS support, so it can work like the other RAIDs. Link to the ticket: MauriceNino/dashdot/issues/980
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to have similar output to what's given for RAIDs in
blockDevices()
. This includes:group
for drives that are included in the RAIDname: 'md...'
,type: 'raid.'
to the output with information about the pool sizeWhat would help to gather the output, would probably be the
brtfs
cli tool.e.g.
Additional context
I have added the current storage output of the user on his system.
Output:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: