-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmark Zarr vs WKW #7245
Comments
Currently blocked by #7241 |
@normanrz could you paste the relevant results here and then close this issue? 🙏 |
Results on Hetzner cloud CCX53 (32 cores, 128G RAM) Benchmarking with wrk (32 threads, 500 conenctions) and a custom lua script
Zarr3 implementation is faster. For color data 2.2x faster and for segmentations 1.2x faster. |
22 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It would be interesting to see how the backend implementation of Zarr3 + Sharding compares to WKW.
We should run a benchmark. We should use a dataset that is available both in WKW and Zarr (e.g.
l4dense_motta_et_al_demo
). Both versions should be on the same local filesystem. As a test, I would recommend random reads to color and segmentation layers.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: