You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I use the default dataset loading to load the NELL dataset, but find that the feature dimension is 61278, much larger than the reported 5414, do you have any thought on that issue?
best
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We follow the experimental setup of GCN, where entity node features are enhanced by a unique one-hot representation for every relation in the dataset. The NELL paragraph in the GCN paper gives additional details.
I tried with the enhanced features but the GCN accuracy was only ~58%, less than the reported 66%, do you have any suggestions for boosting the accuracy to the matched level?
Thanks for sharing, yes the training is not stable, actually, the first 20 epochs can achieve 60+% accuracy while further training will drop the accuracy a lot.
Meanwhile, I tried other GCN architecture, i.e., GAT, which can easily achieve comparable or better accuracy than the reported in GCN paper. Is that common?
From now on, we recommend using our discussion forum (https://github.com/rusty1s/pytorch_geometric/discussions) for general questions.
❓ Questions & Help
Hi, I use the default dataset loading to load the NELL dataset, but find that the feature dimension is 61278, much larger than the reported 5414, do you have any thought on that issue?
best
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: