Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Close the "Add support for pyproject.toml as a way to configure setuptools" item? #53

Closed
sinoroc opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #54
Closed

Close the "Add support for pyproject.toml as a way to configure setuptools" item? #53

sinoroc opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #54

Comments

@sinoroc
Copy link
Contributor

sinoroc commented Feb 27, 2023

Should the "Add support for pyproject.toml as a way to configure setuptools" (current link item be closed? It seems to me like it has been implemented.

If yes, should it be removed or moved to a different section? Which one? There is a section "Items that have now been funded", but as far as I can tell it was done without dedicated funding.

@di
Copy link
Member

di commented Feb 27, 2023

Yes, this appears to be mostly done and likely does not require funding anymore.

@sinoroc
Copy link
Contributor Author

sinoroc commented Feb 27, 2023

@di How to proceed? Any preference?

  • Remove the item (we always have the git log)
  • Move to a different section? What title?
  • Move to a different document? What title?

@di
Copy link
Member

di commented Feb 27, 2023

I think I'd be fine with just removing it!

@sinoroc
Copy link
Contributor Author

sinoroc commented Feb 27, 2023

@abravalheri Do you agree this item can be removed?

@abravalheri
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, it was implemented (at least the basic functionality described in PEP 621).

@di di closed this as completed in #54 Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants