Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CRD description check validation #234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022
Merged

Add CRD description check validation #234

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022

Conversation

ryantking
Copy link
Contributor

This adds a check to the good practices validator that ensures all CRDs
declared in the bundle have non-empty descriptions. Both owned and
required CRDs will be checked. Note that this validates the CRD
definition in the CSV, not any field in the CRD itself.

Signed-off-by: Ryan King ryking@redhat.com

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ecordell and jmrodri April 4, 2022 19:35
}

return append(f(crds.Owned, "owned"), f(crds.Required, "required")...)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 Apr 4, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

feel free to close sorted out. :-)

This adds a check to the good practices validator that ensures all CRDs
declared in the bundle have non-empty descriptions. Both owned and
required CRDs will be checked. Note that this validates the CRD
definition in the CSV, not any field in the CRD itself.

Signed-off-by: Ryan King <ryking@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That shows great for me 👍

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 4, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jmrodri jmrodri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@jmrodri
Copy link
Member

jmrodri commented Apr 5, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 5, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jmrodri, ryantking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 5, 2022
@operator-framework operator-framework deleted a comment from openshift-ci bot Apr 5, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a7ebc81 into operator-framework:master Apr 5, 2022
@ryantking ryantking deleted the feature/2150-validate-crd-descriptions branch April 5, 2022 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants