Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of interpolate_tracks and how to speed them up. #908

Open
pvmilk opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 Discussed in #907 · 0 comments
Open

Implementation of interpolate_tracks and how to speed them up. #908

pvmilk opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 Discussed in #907 · 0 comments

Comments

@pvmilk
Copy link

pvmilk commented Sep 5, 2023

Discussed in #907

Originally posted by pvmilk September 6, 2023
Does anyone have brief explanation of how this is implemented?

https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmtracking/blob/e79491ec8f0b8c86fda947fbaaa824c66ab2a991/mmtrack/core/track/interpolation.py#L5C16-L5C16

I would like to find out whether it is possible to speed up the calculation using parallelism.
I am currently using it and found out that the calculation time seems to be exponential to the number of frames, e.g.

  • 25k frames would use ~70s
  • 75k frames would use ~700s

I am not sure whether this is proportionate to the number of frames OR the number of track_id.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant