You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 14, 2019. It is now read-only.
We should store the revision after a statement has been actioned. This can be compared with this schema:version revision from the SPARQL query to better distinguish between “We updated this, but aren’t seeing that reflected yet”, and “We updated that, but there have since been further updates that have changed something significant” cases.
With this we should improve the “There were no ‘position held’ (P39) statements on Wikidata that match the actioned suggestion” message which sometimes occurs.
We might want to consider increase the grace period where we force a recently actioned statement in the done state to combat the WDQS update lag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T199228 is related to this, wrt lag times (summary: several hours is normal/to be expected; several days is problematic but does happen)
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
We should store the revision after a statement has been actioned. This can be compared with this
schema:version
revision from the SPARQL query to better distinguish between “We updated this, but aren’t seeing that reflected yet”, and “We updated that, but there have since been further updates that have changed something significant” cases.With this we should improve the “There were no ‘position held’ (P39) statements on Wikidata that match the actioned suggestion” message which sometimes occurs.
We might want to consider increase the grace period where we force a recently actioned statement in the done state to combat the WDQS update lag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: